Public Policy Matters

Houston - There are four groups of people in Houston. Those who oppose Mayor Parker because of her sexual orientation; those who oppose her policies on principle; those who oppose her because of her sexual orientation, but use public policy as the reason; and, those who trust the voters' choice, but are disappointed in the way Mayor Parker has implemented her policies.

In truth, liars, drunkards, adulterers, fornicators, murderers, and thieves have occupied the mayor's seat in Houston. Yet, we seemed to have gotten along just fine in the past. What is so different now? Some view the mayor's sexual orientation as sinful and therefore, we have brought God's wrath upon this city. Really? Well there is a born again, evangelical governor in Austin who is running for president. How do you explain the statewide drought and wildfires? Is the state cursed? Certainly your not suggesting he is gay or sinful are you? Why didn't his prayer rally at the Reliant Dome in Houston produce rain and end the drought? In fact, it got so hot afterward, it set a new record. Is God listening to anybody today?

For the record, I don't have to agree with Mayor Parker's sexual orientation to engage in intelligent dialogue about public policy issues. Public safety, community development, economic development, health and human services, transportation, and public works are functions of government that affect all of the citizens of Houston. There is too much at stake to play games with the future of this city. Yes, morality matters. But it is hypocritical to strain at the gnat of Ms. Parker's sexual orientation, while swallowing the camel of cutbacks in education and health care, mass incarceration of our youth, tax breaks for the rich, while increasing "fees" on the middle class. Stop the foolishness. Lets get down to business.

Renew Houston: The Devil is in the Details

I agree with the overall goal of Renew Houston. However, the devil is always in the details. Will this dedicated fund for street construction and maintenance derived from developers impact fees relieve METRO of having to transfer .25 cent of $1 of sales (consumption)tax revenue for general mobility? If not, why not? The city gets 67% of METRO’s .25 cent. Are we being asked to pay twice for the same service? Will we once again go back to using 85% of METRO's resources for 15% of its suburban customers? METRO has 10,000 bus stops but only 2,200 bus shelters. Must METRO inner city riders be left in the rain at bus stops forever?

Why do we keep building in or near flood plains anyway? Why do we insist on suburban style development in an urban core? Yes, private property is sacred in Texas, but that doesn’t mean the rest of us should have to pay for some exercising their freedom. Are there going to be any changes to existing regulations to increase density or insist that those types of development that contribute to flooding pay their fair share?

Lastly, will the promised construction jobs and contracts developed from this proposal be a true economic opportunity for all or will the usual suspects be found feeding from the public trough again?

I need answers before I endorse this proposal.

Drinking the Anti-Metro Kool-Aid

Kool-Aid, Kool-Aid tastes great! Wish I had some -can't wait!

Ah yes, that famous Kool-Aid jingle from my youth. I thought I would never hear it again, but I was wrong. My ears are bleeding everyday from the non stop anti-Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Kool-Aid in the media and in political circles. For the employees and contractors that work for Metro, it is becoming unbearable. The latest glasses of Kool-Aid have been served up by KHOU 11 News Did Metro try to deceive feds to get $900M? and KRIV Fox News CEO Frank Wilson to Leave METRO.

KHOU 11 News' report was very interesting - not for what they reported, but for what they didn't report. By pulling a partial quote from FTA's statement in the news story, KHOU 11 Metro sales tax scam story would leave one to believe that the Federal Transit Administration was contradicting Metro about the sales tax revenue projections in question. To be fair, KHOU 11 covered their ethical butts by posting the FTA's entire statement on their website. But what they didn't put in the news story was what they actually asked FTA and FTA's responses.

Below are the questions KHOU 11 submitted to FTA and FTA's answers. Read and decide for yourself.

KHOU 11
1. Can you please confirm if Metro did indeed transmit the sales tax revenue forecast information from page 24 of that document to FTA/DOT in November 2009 (the date on the front page of that document)? If you received that information on a different date, please provide that date.

FTA
The financial plan dated November 2009 contains the latest projections of sale tax revenues FTA has received from METRO. We received it in November.

KHOU 11
2. Has Metro received any updated information since you received the information I'm referencing from above? If so- what are those new projections- and when did you receive them?

FTA

We cannot comment on what information METRO has received or not received with regard to the sales tax projections since November. You should ask METRO that question. FTA has not received updated sales tax revenue projections from METRO since November 2009.

KHOU 11
3. What is the most current status of any monies (my understanding is $900 million) slated to come to Metro in relation to their application to the federal government for "new starts" funding to begin construction of new rail lines in the Houston area (i.e.- has the money been formally approved to come here yet- and if not, what is the update on that status)?

FTA
Both the North and Southeast Corridor light rail projects are expecting $450 million in New Starts funds, for a total of $900 million. While some of that money has already been appropriated by Congress and awarded by FTA in grants for preliminary engineering and final design work, the majority of the funds will not be provided until after full funding grant agreements (FFGAs) are executed and Congress appropriates the additional funds. FTA expects to execute FFGAs for the projects sometime this summer, following our internal review and a required 60-day Congressional notification period.

Now does anything in these answers resemble a surprised FTA being alerted to a scam perpetrated by Houston Metro? In fact, the answer to question number 3 is an affirmation that Metro will have a full funding agreement by this summer pending final review.

Here is Metro's response to the KHOU 11 News story. Read and decide for yourself.

Khou Ch. 11 aired a story at 10 PM last night alleging that METRO submitted outdated sales tax projections to the FTA last November to intentionally deceive so as to win federal funding (because 2008 projections were higher than those made in 2009).

The allegation is completely and utterly false. In fact, much of what was reported in the story was inaccurate and misleading. . METRO has been working closely with the Federal Transit Administration for over five years and has followed the federal funding process to a "T." METRO developed sales tax projections in June, 2008 and provided those figures to the FTA in September, 2008. The most recent sales tax projections were developed jointly with the FTA in July, 2009 and were submitted to the FTA in August, 2009 for entry into Final Design. (Note: FTA requires that all financial assumptions are frozen at Final Design entry.) It should also be noted that METRO and its outside financial advisor, First Southwest, independently prepare a financial capacity analysis which utilizes sales tax projections from September, 2009. That forecast was discussed publicly at the December, 2009 Board meeting.

What is really going on here? Anti Metro, anti-rail, anti-Frank Wilson Kool-Aid is what. You don't have to be a fan of Frank Wilson, light rail or Metro to know that the powers to be want him out. Instead of honoring his contract, it has been decided to do the Texas Two Step - create a scandal, convene a grand jury to indicte - then offer to drop the charges if the target resigns (the old Wilson better get out of town by sundown without his loot or else trick).

Let me tell you what my sources told me this afternoon at 4 PM CST. Metro CEO Frank Wilson has no intention of resigning unless and until Metro honors the terms of his contract. No amount of muckraking is going to scare this tough South Philly boy off. If they want him to leave - they should pay up! This doesn't appear to be a case of the books being cooked - but more of an attempt to book the cook!

Warning: My sources in government and the transportation industry are saying this ill advised, ham handed attempt to get Frank Wilson to resign via character assassination is endangering Houston's federal transit funding and will have a chilling effect on any capable, competent and qualified candidate wanting to come to our great city to head our transit agency.

Connect the Dots

Join the Unofficial, Unauthorized, Unfunded Houston 2020 Summer Olympics Committee

I, Robert Muhammad, am the self appointed, self directed, self recognized Chairman of the unofficial, unauthorized, unfunded Houston 2020 Summer Olympics Committee.

Houston, Texas is a non-zoned, free market, developer friendly city that has no comprehensive plan to speak of. Getting the development community to work together toward a common vision is like trying to herd cats. Its hard to stop what you are doing when your short term interests are so lucritive, even though your long term prosperity is in jeopardy. What is needed is a unifying cause or goal. I don't believe anything less than a man on the moon by the end of next decade challenge will do.


Daniel Burham, co-author of the Chicago Plan of 1909 said: "Make no little plans. They have no magic to stir men’s blood and probably themselves will not be realized. Make big plans; aim high in hope and work, remembering that a noble, logical diagram once recorded will never die.”

In order to prepare to host the Olympics we need a plan. That plan needs to be big! It should include some of the following ideas:

·We need a first class integrated, multi modal, mass transit system which includes light rail, commuter rail and high speed rail connecting Houston, Dallas, Austin/San Antonio (a Texas Triangle not a T-Bone). Madrid is bidding for the 2016 Olympics. They have a regional transportation authority, a consortium to do the construction and Madrid Metro Operates the system.
·
We can build and operate such a system if we don't siphon off another $2.7 billion dollars from our mass transit system under the guise of general mobility over the next 10 years. For instance, there are nearly 10,000 bus stops in the MTA system with only 2,200 bus shelters. That’s criminal in this heat! Don’t blame Metro, it’s not running the deficit, the city and county are plugging their deficit with mass transit money.

We need a minimum $2 billion dollar investment in our storm water and waste water system. $50 million a year is not going to suffice given our rate of projected growth over the next 30 years.

We have to build and upgrade millions of square feet of housing, hotel, and activities facilities inside the 610 Loop (U of H, TSU, Rice, Stadiums). This build out left behind after the Olympics will make our city a much better place. The planned olympic villages can be converted to mixed income, mixed use workforce housing.

Finally, we need a plan to train and employ all able body homeless persons in an effort to clean up and transform this city over the next 10 years.

Where there is no vision the people perish: Proverbs 29:18
A vision without people shall perish: Rev. Kirby John Caldwell
A vision without a plan is a hallucination: Former Dallas Mayor Ron Kirk